|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Gallery | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
General For anything else WD or hifi |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Cambridge azur 640c Cd player
Hi all
Has any one heard this Cambridge 640c CD player if so what are your impressions of the sound quality and is it good value for money or would any one recommened any other Player for the same money. Regards Acorn |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Cambridge azur 640c Cd player
Hi Acorn-i have one of the older models (500 SE ) and am very pleased with it,even more so with the Derek Shek DAC and switch mode power supply.
it was not well reviewed in the Hi-Fi press but was by private buyers. one thing that was noted by private buyers was the poor quality of the standard power lead and that it took a long time to "run in". As per usual its up to the individual to listen and decide,but my experience of previous purchases is that a brief listen in a shop demo room is often not the best way to decide. it seems Cambridge equipment is generally good value for money. Philip |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cambridge azur 640c Cd player
Hi Acorn
I had one and I absoultely hated it. I found it harsh, clinical and really nasty! I had disposed of an earlier 500se to buy this and deeply regretted it. It has been replaced with my much-modded Pioneer 575 which continues to suit my needs. The 640 was so universally favourably reviewed that I did wonder if I had a bad un, but I couldn't pin my dissatisfaction down to any particular type of fault. YMMV, IMHO etc. Mark |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cambridge azur 640c Cd player
I had a 640c for a few days, i also had the price equivalent NAD and Marantz to try out. I was looking for a cheap player to use temporarily whilst saving for something better.
None of them really did anything for me. The Nad sounded sort of cold, i think sterile is the correct term, the Marantz was better but typically bright, and the 640c sounded in some waY unnatural as i remember(another What HiFi Best Buy). In fact i took the 640c back to the shop because it had a noisy transport. The replacement was fine but sounded just the same. So i bought a DVD575 which comfortably trounces them all IMHO. I've still got it now and have no intention of changing it for a "proper" cd player just yet. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Cambridge azur 640c Cd player
Thanks Lads
It looks like the pioneer wins hands down again. Acorn |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Cambridge azur 640c Cd player
Hi-would i be right in saying that those of you who had a Cambridge 500s/e and replaced it with a DV-575 found it an "improvement" ?
seems impossible to get a new 575 now,unless anyone knows different ! Philip |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cambridge azur 640c Cd player
I came to the DV-575 via a Cambridge 640 and had already disposed of the 500se to buy the 640 (fool!). Auditory memory is not reliable so all I can really say is that I liked the 500se and the Pioneer, and I believe (but have not done A/B comparison) that the Pioneer is better than the 500se. I think that the 500se and the Pioneer both shared a lively, 'fun' quality of which the 640 had none!
Mark |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jumping CD player | cjnuk | General | 10 | 11th October 2006 09:01 PM |
Cambridge Audio Azur Range | Swithers | General | 6 | 19th September 2006 08:00 PM |
Anyone thought of modding a digital storage CD player? | Paul Welsby | General | 2 | 22nd January 2006 11:22 AM |