|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Gallery | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Amplifiers Your DIY amplifier designs |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
james - shunt reg q
was talking to nick the other day
and now i'm confused so with your bouncy shunt reg design do i need to shunt 120% of idle current or 120% of signal current and if the latter how do i calculate it dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
For SE the best sound is when you shunt 120% of the idle current... for PP its about 50% of idle current
ciao James |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
)^&(£)&_^_%6
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
Hey Dave,
Is it for a phono? Then somewhere between signal current double the signal current should be more than enough. As James said elsewhere, there's usually quite a bit of standing current in a phono by keeping gm high and noise down, no point shunting this - as its a fixed load. cheers, -- Andrew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
But you can start from about 50% of the idle current and work upwards as and when able. Just make sure you have some good capacitance before it to buffer the shunt when it runs out of current on peaks...
As with all music most of the time the amp is cruising at 20% of peak or less and thats where the shunt works best - of course it helps deliver clean peaks and cleans up after the peak really well if you have the current capacity in the shunt but it is still worth doing if you can get to 50% of idle current - or there abouts... Andrews point is accurate for some/most phono's but ones that run at 2 or 3 mA per stage should have full idle current shunt reg James |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
Hi Dave and James,
Of course my mind is on the the 1k5, you are, as usual, quite correct! cheers, -- Andrew |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: james - shunt reg q
Now I am getting more confused, why is a SE output stage stage best at 120% when there is a big inductor to reduce the variation in current, whereas in a phono SE stage, where there is no inductor and the PSRR is higher because of that, and you have huge gain, especially at low frequencies, less is ok?
I can see the point of 120% if you are actually regulating the DC voltage, but I thought the shunt was only operating at AC in this case, and at DC was just a constant current load, Confused of Halifax.
__________________
Just about everything I say has been in public use since the 1940's so no one owns the copyright on that. If by any chance its not prior art, then the copyright is retained by me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
andrew
no already done the phono just trying various choke:cap combos chaps for a few moments there was light now i find myself all damp + extinguished slapped by a wet herring or something..... that's 560mA current plus headroom for the tx dave |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shunt mod pot | pre65 | General | 34 | 16th November 2006 05:00 PM |
Question on shunt regulation, JamesD's in particular | ChrisV | Amplifiers | 7 | 31st October 2006 02:39 PM |
James' Quasars | Max N | Loudspeakers | 47 | 13th August 2006 08:25 PM |
KEL84: Output Transformer Upgrade / Shunt Mod | pete_b | WAD General | 10 | 16th April 2006 07:55 PM |