World-Designs-Forum  

Go Back   World-Designs-Forum > DIY Projects > Sources
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Sources Your DIY source designs (turntables etc.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th February 2006, 11:54 AM
IslandPink IslandPink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denbigh, North Wales
Posts: 704
Default Torsional vibration; Gimballed vs Unipivot

OK Folks,

I had a moment of clarity the other night while listening to some music . This is not the normal state of mind I seek at this time, but you never know when it's going to hit you I suppose .

I was musing about the transmission of vibration through a tonearm to its support, wondering about why this interface is still important musically .

I think I now understand why there is STILL vibration that has to be resisted by the arm-pillar, for a gimballed arm, and why unipivots differ ( crucially ) in this respect .

From what I can see , the gimballed arm is decoupled for two important motions ONLY - the side to side pull caused by lateral stylus ( music ) motion, and the up and down vibration caused by vertical music modulation and record warps . These motions are then mainly resisted by the counterweight, which is the preferrable state of affairs as far as I can see - a short and relatively 'clean' mechanical interaction . There is at least one important motion that is NOT effectively decoupled by the bearings . This is the torsional ( twisting ) motion - caused by lateral stylus motion and the moment of the stylus around the arm-tube centre axis . This is mentioned in
Mark Baker's woffle on his Origin Live website and promo material, with reference to submarines attacked by depth-charges and suchlike .

There are other effects , maybe significant or not - a push-pull effect along the length of the arm, for instance . I don't know how big these effects are, and I don't think they differ from gimballed to unipivot arms .

In any case, if you think about the torsional mode , this one ( high-frequency, as usual, due to RIAA ) goes down the arm and may cause chatter in one or both of the bearings , but even if it doesn't , it ends up as
a bending motion on the arm pillar or on the arm mounting flange and on any interface between arm pillar/flange and the plinth . Any difference in hardness here then causes a reflection of energy back ; any looseness causes 'noise'
to be generated which also feeds back . In either case, this junk signal has no chance of coming back in phase with any musical signal and must cause distortion or clouding of the original music .

What's very interesting to me , is that this mode of vibration, and the problems that can be caused, do NOT happen with a unipivot - this torsional mode is decoupled at the unipivot , and is resisted solely by the counterweight and any outriggers , together with the basic stiffness of the arm tube . This seems preferable .

I can already feel JamesD chuckling to himself, thinking how each new bunch of audiophiles has to rediscover these audio truths for themselves and present them as 'new insight' ... !
Hope this is of interest .

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13th February 2006, 12:16 PM
Clive Clive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alrincham, Cheshire, UK
Posts: 788
Default Re: Torsional vibration; Gimballed vs Unipivot

Mark,

I wish you'd stop trying to get me to spend more money on a Hadcock/Morsiani etc.

Your arguement seems logical and quite obvious....now that you've made the point. Wish I'd had the clarity of thought.

Clive
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13th February 2006, 01:30 PM
Black Stuart Black Stuart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: France
Posts: 1,156
Cool Re: Torsional vibration; Gimballed vs Unipivot

Well thought out,
and as someone pointed out on another thread - why did the belt drive take over so completely from the idler - cheaper/quicker and simpler to produce - ergo more profit.

Black Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th February 2006, 03:19 PM
James D James D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: Torsional vibration; Gimballed vs Unipivot

Mark,



Very nicely thought through. Now are you and Clive going to make your own unipivots? It really is the only way to go...

James
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13th February 2006, 04:27 PM
IslandPink IslandPink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denbigh, North Wales
Posts: 704
Default Re: Unipivots

Hmmm,
Yes, usually have some form of 'clarity of thought' after I've spent a lot of money . 'Welcome to the next level' as JC Morrison said , this time in analogue gear .

Now then James, where were those DIY links - there was a nice-looking acrylic one I saw somewhere .

You must understand this project has to take its place after the SE amp ( end of this week ?! ) and the phono mods , then the subwoofer ...

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13th February 2006, 04:58 PM
bornin50 bornin50 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
Default Re: Torsional vibration; Gimballed vs Unipivot

Hi All,

If this is crazy let me know.

This decoupling of the unipivot idea, do you think it also applies to knife-edge designs, a bit? And could similar effects explain the positive user feedback for the Rega vtaff, which decouples the arm from the fixing?


Regards

Colin
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another DIY Unipivot simon2a3 Sources 29 3rd June 2007 04:26 AM
Who wants a Schroeder or a unipivot? Shane Sources 26 12th January 2007 10:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright World Designs