|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Gallery | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Loudspeakers Your DIY Speaker designs |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
The only thing I can think of, which I think Martin touched on, is if the drive units were non linear, but then I would have tought you would need to do mire than just reverse the magnet, I would think mounting the drive unit facing into the speaker on the baffle (if you see what I mean).
Steef. have you any sides on the baffle? I would have thought you would get a lot of front back cancelation at LF. Also, how well do the mid ranges handle the LF if they are run full range?
__________________
Just about everything I say has been in public use since the 1940's so no one owns the copyright on that. If by any chance its not prior art, then the copyright is retained by me. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
ciao / sorry for my English
really I don't know what happens inside this copule... I have found better sound - just that another strange situation is when change different amplifier to drive this type of loudspeaker the sound still be the same for that reason I'm thinking on back-EMF not for cancelation but for balancing for balancing i mean an average of two asymmetry-symmetricalness waves it presupposes that engines are in disequilibrium between front and rear wave or push and pull cone a friend tell me this parameter is called skewness but there isn't in our audio measure... Steef. have you any sides on the baffle? I would have thought you would get a lot of front back cancelation at LF. Also, how well do the mid ranges handle the LF if they are run full range? if i have understand: no don't have baffle more the Surf you can see the middle works full range - in phase with all cones |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
As far as I can see from the patent application the 'invention' relates only to the 'counter electromotive force'. From these I deduce that it is assumed that magnets from two speakers in close proximity will alter the overall magnetic field. By reversing the polarity of one of the magnets it is expected (hoped) that the field disruption is optimised.
Actually I would have thought that the strength of field in the gap is unlikely to be affected by other, nearby, magnets as the focussing effect of the top plate is quite extreme for the magnet in contact with it. However the change in magnetic field characteristics around the speakers may affect other things, like the nearby crossover, so who knows? |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
last creation of Steef Lab
this little loudspeaker use Vifa drivers and have bass-reflex also a magnet's polarity reversed good natural sound in small space |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
Did u try protecting vifas with cap?
I find it sound less muddled n bettee overall to do so. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
looks like you're losing your 'a' and 'd' and 's' key occasionally now as well Paul!
Must be time for a new keyboard, surely? |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
I know it must be anoying to read, it's only when using the laptop. I don't suppose it's economic to replace a laptop keyboard.
I do use the onscreen keyboard at times like now, but sometimes I'm in a hurry. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
Paul do you still use a latitude?
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Surf Dipole 3 Ways
Hi Paul,
Your dyslexic keyboard compliments you. I understand your posts as ever, regardless of the tool Best wishes, Greg |