World-Designs-Forum  

Go Back   World-Designs-Forum > DIY Projects > Amplifiers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Amplifiers Your DIY amplifier designs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 2nd April 2007, 03:38 PM
NickG's Avatar
NickG NickG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,767
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

Quote:
The 1meg grid leak resistor on the 76 is quite a high value, although 9 pin valves are OK with this I don't recall the 76 details, but reducing it to 500k wouldn't harm anything else, but would suit the valve better.
Reply With Quote
Just FYI, the RCA specs specify 1M as the maximum value. As Paul says changing to 500k wouldn't hurt, especially as the RCA specs probabbly didn't expect the valve to be used 60 years later.
__________________
Just about everything I say has been in public use since the 1940's so no one owns the copyright on that.

If by any chance its not prior art, then the copyright is retained by me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 2nd April 2007, 06:01 PM
The Shadow's Avatar
The Shadow The Shadow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: God only knows
Posts: 1,044
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

Hi Nick/Paul,
I have reduced the input Z to 470K as I had run out of 1M resistors to parallel up to get the 500K. Near enough I hope.

Just about to transfer the Sowters to the new chassis so should be up and running in a couple of hours.
__________________
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 2nd April 2007, 06:25 PM
NickG's Avatar
NickG NickG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,767
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

Quote:
I have reduced the input Z to 470K as I had run out of 1M resistors to parallel up to get the 500K. Near enough I hope.
Unless you have a preamp with a single ecc83 as a output stage, 500k could meant anything from 100k to 999k

:-)
__________________
Just about everything I say has been in public use since the 1940's so no one owns the copyright on that.

If by any chance its not prior art, then the copyright is retained by me.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 2nd April 2007, 08:02 PM
The Shadow's Avatar
The Shadow The Shadow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: God only knows
Posts: 1,044
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

So it's not that critical as long as it is not too near 1Meg then

The amp has been successfully tested and fired up in the system. I'll leave commenting on the sound until I have let it settle for a couple of days but it is very pleasant and easy to listen to.

The finish however I will talk about. The whole amp is built on a 6mm thick clear polycarbonate subchassis decoupled from the wooden cabinet by rubber washers. More rubber washers sit on top of the subchassis in each corner and midway along each long side. Atop these washers sits another 6mm polycarbonate top plate to which are attached the output transformers. Thus the only visible fixings are the two front screws holding the transformers and the two front screws holding the top plate

The top plate has been sprayed with a Rover charcoal metallic finish on the underside. This method of spraying the back of a transparent material was copied from the way the tuning dial glass was done on our old 1950s Ferguson radiogram. The thing about this method of painting is that you are guaranteed a virtually flawless finish.

It looks nice.
The preamp rebuild is next on the cards with the same finish.

Steve
__________________
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 3rd April 2007, 10:08 PM
The Shadow's Avatar
The Shadow The Shadow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: God only knows
Posts: 1,044
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

A few teething problems today.

Sat listening this morning when the music gently faded out leaving nothing but the sub chugging away. The 76s had gone out dammit!

Lifting the hood and the problem soon revealed itself. It was a dry joint in the heater cct where the run to the 76s teed off from the last 12E14. It must have been sparking away merrily as it had melted the insulation on the wire. So that heater run had to be replaced. A right bl***y job. That was just the beginning.

After much cursing the offending heater run was replaced. Checking the voltages at the 76s there were only 9 volts at the cathodes where there should have been 13; ominous.

Checking the 12E14s I had 40V at one cathode and 44V at the other and the HT was down. There was only 254 volts of HT coming into the B+ rail. I had lost 80V of HT somewhere; so according to the curves for the 12E14s, with the anodes at 245V and 40V at the cathodes they were cramped up to hell on the negative going signal, not good.

My eyes fell on the God knows how old used Sheldon 5U4G rectifier feeding the power amp supply. Swapped it for a NOS GZ37 and bingo! We were back in business....
Except for one problem. I had done the calculations for the potential divider that fed the 76s from measurements taken with a fading rectifier in, so the 76s were now way too high! God knows how I didn't notice that the HT was down and twig that something might be up when I did the calculations. Wouldn't have stopped the heaters going down but would have saved a lot of grief elsewhere.

Redoing the potential divider brought the 76s back into line but the 12E14s were still wrong. So the cathode resistors ended up being reduced to get the cathode voltages back away from the cramped up region.

Jeez! The things the Thermionic Gods send to try our patience.
Serves me right for playing with obscure tubes and old used rectifiers.

Steve.
__________________
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.

Last edited by The Shadow; 3rd April 2007 at 10:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 4th April 2007, 08:06 AM
dave dove dave dove is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: mid wales
Posts: 287
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

sounds like you're having great fun steve

dave
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 4th April 2007, 08:55 AM
Paul Barker's Avatar
Paul Barker Paul Barker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 1,615
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

Yes old rectifiers are an issue.

I've been using solid state for some time now out of convenience, and don't find it a major issue.

I believe if you use the Cree diodes (voltage allowing, as you can't voltage share with them) there is no loss in quality against your gz37.

Yes it is always nice to use valves, but if we don't compromise in a few areas we end up building a giant unreliable monster.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 4th April 2007, 10:02 AM
The Shadow's Avatar
The Shadow The Shadow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: God only knows
Posts: 1,044
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

Hi Dave/Paul,

Yes.....took the best part of yesterday to sort the b****y thing out but it's now running sweet as a nut and back to being a seductive old smoothie in the Leslie Phillips class of valve amps

Paul.
Power supplies of the solid state regulated variety are definitely something I would like to look at in the future. Once the preamp has been rebuilt this holiday, I will probably embark on a marathon reading exercise starting with Morgan Jones huge chapter on PSUs.

The dual power supply I currently have is serving me well but I could do with one that puts out a range of voltages say 100, 250, 350, and 500VDC plus 2.0, 2.5. 5 6.3 and 12.6VDC for heaters.

Such a supply could probably fit into a case about the size of a 19" rack mount or a computer server shelf.
Now this is not a project to be undertaken lightly (could be expensive for one thing) but would with careful auditioning at each stage be something that could be an eventual fit and forget solution.

Steve
__________________
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.

Last edited by The Shadow; 4th April 2007 at 11:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 4th April 2007, 01:18 PM
IslandPink IslandPink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denbigh, North Wales
Posts: 704
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

Paul

"Yes it is always nice to use valves, but if we don't compromise in a few areas we end up building a giant unreliable monster."

Wow , a shocking change of engineering approach for Mr. Barker then


MJ
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 4th April 2007, 01:22 PM
slowmotion's Avatar
slowmotion slowmotion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 100
Default Re: 12E1 SE Amplifier

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Barker View Post

Yes it is always nice to use valves, but if we don't compromise in a few areas we end up building a giant unreliable monster.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IslandPink View Post
Wow , a shocking change of engineering approach for Mr. Barker then


MJ
That was funny
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright World Designs