World-Designs-Forum  

Go Back   World-Designs-Forum > WAD > WAD Problems
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

WAD Problems For questions and answers re older World Audio Design Projects

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 22nd July 2006, 04:40 AM
BOONDI's Avatar
BOONDI BOONDI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dundee, Scotland.
Posts: 1,078
Default Re: 300B Hum

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickG
I may be missing someting in that diag, AFAIKS the only thing that the balanced operation will give is the ability to have a phase change switch.

The input is single ended, and uses a LTP to produce the antiphase signal (the fuse in the grid circuit looks odd). I don't know if there is any result of the shared cathodes where the other half of the signal is eventually unused.
Hi Nick, Ian...all.

Nick, have to agree about balanced operation, and it seems to me that the switch is already on the drawing. I think this will give phase reversal depending on switch position.
Also, dont see the point of the fuse because a short inside the valve will (both triodes inside same valve) basically still be able to find earth thru the power supply line or heater anyway. if the grid goes down will the triode now behave like a diode? Or a straight short over the triode with the fuse in may well blow the fuse but still leave the current to flow thru the shorted section....

Seems over blown to me to have twin phase splitter with push pull output for a phono stage, well that's what it looks like to me.....Doesn't help that I have to hold my head at 90 degrees as my new version of Acrobat reader can't rotate the page.....

Ian, I owned a KEL34 that was basically the first one that shipped when WAD introduced the upgraded EI core Tx's and kit of parts. When it shipped it came with the wrong pcb and errors in the instructions. As dissapointed as I was when I fired it up and caps started to pop and etc. I have to say that after a telephone call to WAD the problems were rectified with me being talked through the rebuild and testing over the phone. After the initial problems, I have to say that my KEL gave me sterling service for 5 years and had no problems whatsoever. I think you may have been unlucky and have bought some of the less well built versions of WAD kit. I.E. not built by people that have vast knowledge of kit building/negligible soldering or mechanical skills etc. The kits themselves were quite good, well thought out and excellent value for money IMHO. The new W-D kt 88 looks well tasty and Peter should be congratulated for his recent acheivments. I remember a conversation on the old forum where some of the members were talking about buying the WAD stock on the cheap as part of a members buy-out. However, Peter went out on a limb and salvaged the kits that remained and was brave enough to re-market them under the W-D brand. If they were truely **** then the WAD kits would have disappeared without trace and we would be homeless.

P.S Ian don't worry, I agree with you about amature builders and idiot upgraders, but for me, the worst are the phantom dabblers.....They are the people who know nothing and tamper inside tv's and etc. often turning a simple fault hunt into a mammoth job. Eventually when you figure this out and question them on what they did to the circuit, whey still deny it and refuse to admit they turned this pot up or screwed that tunning slug down etc.etc.etc

Regards....
__________________
Who am I? Just another concerned citizen....

ONE LOVE
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 27th July 2006, 10:10 AM
Jeff W
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 300B Hum

Hello to everyone: interesting how one question can generate so much passion and knowledge. If I could, momentarily, drag it back to my problem, I'm pleased to say that it seems to be fixed. I re-soldered some of the signal wires and it's now a tad quieter than before!
For the record, I am one of those complete amateurs who knows nothing of electronics and who, on balance, perhaps should not have attempted to build these amps as a first project. I did so because the 300B PSE was the only amp I auditioned (that I could just abut afford) that provided the sound for which I had long sought. I mention this only as some kind of explanation as to why some of us did this despite natural misgivings. Once they were working well I just sat back and smiled. I doubt I hear them at their best using my old Audiolab 8000A as a pre-amp, but they still sound fine.
Thanks to everyone who helped.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16th October 2006, 10:02 PM
LGarfirth's Avatar
LGarfirth LGarfirth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SW London, Mitcham
Posts: 21
Red face Re: 300B Hum

Hear hear Jeff. I love mine too !! and I didn't have a clue either. What I really like is when friends come round and comment - I just sit back and say.

I made those, good arn't they ??
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrading my 300B Fi Primer Pedro Amplifiers 15 10th September 2006 03:20 PM
300b S/E problems. pre65 Amplifiers 4 16th July 2006 07:27 PM
300B PP circuit diagram gooseganda General 2 27th June 2006 04:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright World Designs