|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Gallery | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Wish List Poll your project wishes here |
| View Poll Results: Should WD include a 300B Single Ended Amp in the range? | |||
| Yes - a high quality one should be in the range |
   
|
38 | 92.68% |
| No - everyone else offers them already |
  
|
3 | 7.32% |
| Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
1st January 2006, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
300B SE Amp
300B SE Amp
Many members are experienced builders. Please think back to your earlier days of knowledge and ability and vote as you would see fit for the future direction of WD. This may be slightly different to your own requirement today. Rich Last edited by Richard; 1st January 2006 at 06:11 PM. 
|
|
#2
1st January 2006, 05:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 300B SE Amp
I would vote YES, as it is a must have in a valve kit range.
Last edited by Lord.; 1st January 2006 at 06:09 PM.
|
|
#3
1st January 2006, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 300B SE Amp
I'll vote YES too.
|
|
#4
1st January 2006, 06:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300B SE Amp
Yes, but it should have somthing to distinguish it from the crowd, as the poll says, there are a lot about. Parafeed, Loftin White, DRD, Choke input supply, amorphous transformers, Tx coupled, Dave/James Akido drive etc.
__________________
Just about everything I say has been in public use since the 1940's so no one owns the copyright on that. If by any chance its not prior art, then the copyright is retained by me.
|
|
#6
2nd January 2006, 11:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 300B SE Amp
Yes...there should be one in the range,as it will satisfy a lot of people's demands for an affordable taste of proper high-end audio,even though my own personal choice,for various reasons,was a PP 300B,mainly to satisfy the needs for slightly higher power and control for a set of ESLs.
|
|
#7
3rd January 2006, 09:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300B SE Amp
Yes but keep it affordable simple and safe for first timers, but at the same time don't clone AN Kit 1.
__________________
|
|
#8
3rd January 2006, 01:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 300B SE Amp
Quote:
Good points....I never liked the finish etc on the AN kit 1,which looked a tad too hair-shirt even for my likings,and certainly wouldnt have gone down well with the other half. I think the main problem now is the vast influx of cheap and relatively well made chinese amps,and thus any kit has to be pitched into a relatively small market that wants better quality and the ability to tweak the components,without excess cost.
|
|
#9
3rd January 2006, 10:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300B SE Amp
Hi Alex,
You can be sure that Paul's comments do not relate to the appearance of an Audionote kit. Without doubt he'll be referring to the circuit. When you've seen one of Paul's amps, you'll completely understand what I mean  Best wishes, Greg
|
|
#10
3rd January 2006, 11:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 300B SE Amp
Bang on. Actually I have seen an Kit1. It's not the look that I am comenting on, but the 6sn7 cascade Flesh and Blood Je Labs AN kit1 American table top radio circuit clones. Too many samey midrich valves.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading my 300B Fi Primer | Pedro | Amplifiers | 15 | 10th September 2006 03:20 PM |
| 300b S/E problems. | pre65 | Amplifiers | 4 | 16th July 2006 07:27 PM |
| 300B PP circuit diagram | gooseganda | General | 2 | 27th June 2006 04:16 PM |
Linear Mode
