World-Designs-Forum  

Go Back   World-Designs-Forum > WAD > WAD General
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

WAD General For discussions re World Audio Design

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24th April 2006, 01:48 PM
LSfarzo LSfarzo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy, naples
Posts: 48
Default Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

Hi,
I was looking around on the forum and on the net as I would tweak my Phono II. I tweaked my kat 6550 and I had amazing results so I decided to tweak the other unit, too. I found many useful things expecially from the last threads on this forum and so I would try to make a brief summary of the expecially reccomended tweaks for this item. as all the info are quite a bit "scattered" all around..

I would ask you all if you're so kind to help me to complete this listing:

1) PIO caps for the 0.1 uF and 2.2 uF capacitors, the C12/13 and C22/23 on the latest electro diagram from WAD.
The 0.1uF cap seems to be "one of the most critical component as it is the only coupling cap". Successfuly reported used brands (in descent order) Audio Note Copper Foil (more expensive), Jensen Copper Foil, Hovland Music Caps, Dynamicap, Russian teflon (PTFE) caps. All them would do their work, some other brand (i.e. russian PIO caps on ebay) have been successfully tested. A major improvement has been reported though they're quite expensive;anyway it is worth the price. Rating: A+

2) Silver Mica capacitors for the other two couple of caps: 220pF (C22/C23) and 8.2pF (C16/C17). 1% tolerance caps are needed. Some general improvement, anyway those components seems to be quite cheap so they're worth the effort. Rating: B+

3) Tantalium Resistors.Some users experiencies report they're fine anyway it is not clear where they've been used (all resist. have been swapped??) and wich brand has been used.. Do AN resistors perform the same as many other common brands (which are really less expensive)?. This item has to be completed with the resistors ID to be swapped and with the brands. Rating B+

4) ECC83: which brands to look for? Are the substitution really worth the effort? Rating:?

5) The internal wiring: the wire for the input from the arm cable (the original one is a braided one) seems to be very critical though no info have been found about some other types which would have been successfully tested. Rating ?

6) Phono II 1st stage battery bias. A good tweak but it requires you to change the hardware and not only a component swapping.. Seems to result in a very good improvement. Rating: A-

Please if you have some other suggestions, improvements or if you have comments please report so we could try to organize a list of modding to be tried.

Thank you
Luca,
Italy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26th April 2006, 08:10 AM
stevef
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

Hi Luca

I've mod'ed my Phono II as follows....

1) I changed the orange drop caps (C14 & 15, C18 & 19) with Auricaps form Partsconnexion. Beware that the leads on these caps are thick - I would advise fitting pegs on the PCB and soldering the leads onto these rather try to enlarge the wire holes.

2) Changed the two elec caps (C12 & 13) with std Blackgates from Partsconnexion.

3) Carried out the 3.18uS RIAA time constant correction by inserting parallelled 75k and 18k resistors on left and right channels between C16/17 and junction of R31/32 and V4b/a.

The most significant improvement came from mod number 3 and cost pennies!

Hope this helps?

I have a KIT 6550 and would be interested in hearing about your tweaks.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26th April 2006, 08:12 AM
stevef
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

Luca

Meant to mention that I'm using Brimar ECC 83's and found these to be v good and an improvemet over the originals supplied with the kit. I got them off eBay.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26th April 2006, 10:44 AM
KennyK's Avatar
KennyK KennyK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 191
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

steve, could you expand on what improvments you found with the brimars?


my own tweaks to the phonoII are:

3.18us Mod, using the second resistor option (75k / 18k)
1k Vishay resistors replacing the first and last resistors in the signal path
10k vishay resistors for cartridge loading
orange drops(C18/19) 2.2uf and (C13/14) 8.2uF replaced with PIO 'military' grades (courtesy of Stuart)

is it worth replacing C10/C11 with something better?

Rob also recommended to me bypassing the psu electrolytic with tiny value polypropelenes. I'm not sure whether to do the HT or the Heater supply (or both)

I've also fitted XLR connectors to the rear of my phono, as I'm running long leads from the turntable, I've gone 'balanced' into the MC stepups.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27th April 2006, 08:37 PM
stevef
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

Hi Kenny

The biggest difference I noticed with the Brimars was in the bass - tighter and clearer. Of course, as with any tube rolling, it takes time to change 'em over and get the hot.... but of all I've tried to date I stuck with these for now.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27th April 2006, 09:57 PM
colin.hepburn colin.hepburn is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newtonhill Aberdeenshire
Posts: 2,721
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyK
steve, could you expand on what improvments you found with the brimars?


my own tweaks to the phonoII are:

3.18us Mod, using the second resistor option (75k / 18k)
1k Vishay resistors replacing the first and last resistors in the signal path
10k vishay resistors for cartridge loading
orange drops(C18/19) 2.2uf and (C13/14) 8.2uF replaced with PIO 'military' grades (courtesy of Stuart)

is it worth replacing C10/C11 with something better?

Rob also recommended to me bypassing the psu electrolytic with tiny value polypropelenes. I'm not sure whether to do the HT or the Heater supply (or both)

I've also fitted XLR connectors to the rear of my phono, as I'm running long leads from the turntable, I've gone 'balanced' into the MC stepups.
Hi All
I have been following you posts with grate interest
I am about too start my Wad Phono II just waiting for my pbs too come thought the post so i will be starting from a blank sheet It would be very much helpfully if you guys can Post a list of all the parts and value's in one list thanks
Cheers
Colin
__________________
The Blues man

Turntable Rega 3 custom RB250 with ortofon 2M Blue /other goldring 1042 /WD phono2 /WD CF pre custom converted /WD psu2 /home built JE Labs Single Ended 6SL7/KT66/Speakers Frugal horns Mk1s
Other turntables AR EB101/Thorns TD150mk2/Thorns TD160mk2


If you have trouble reading my posts its because I am a dyslexic member
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 3rd May 2006, 10:03 AM
KennyK's Avatar
KennyK KennyK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 191
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

I've been looking at replacing the coupling caps C10 & C11, as that seems to be a critical component.

are Audio Note Silvers worth the money, or should I stick to the cheaper copper ones?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3rd May 2006, 10:25 AM
Clive Clive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alrincham, Cheshire, UK
Posts: 788
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

You should definately put in capacitors you like the sound of at C10/11. You need these to be balanced in sound with C18/19.

Greg uses Russian teflon for the 10/11 and I think some PIOs for 18/19. The alternative approach is to use the same in both positions if you've found the perfect cap for you.

For 10/11 you could consider silver mica from diyhifisupply, they do them for $56 for a pair. AN Silver are very good, probably close to sliver mica but they are very different to AN Copper. Silver's are very neutral and revealing, Coppers are warmer and slightly coloured in the mid (in a very pleasant way). So many capacitors to chose from v-caps etc too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 3rd May 2006, 10:41 AM
KennyK's Avatar
KennyK KennyK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 191
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

Thanks for that, Clive. the Audio Note Silvers are £76+vat each
what I'm wondering is if they are that much better than the special silver mica.

will changing C10/11 for anything better lower the noise floor or will it colour the sound?

I've got Russian PIO in C14/15 and C18/19 already, and vishay resistors at R15/16 and R35/36
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 3rd May 2006, 10:56 AM
Clive Clive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alrincham, Cheshire, UK
Posts: 788
Default Re: Phono II Tweaks - a summary -

I suspect that sliver mica will be just as good, if not better that AN Silver.

Changing C10/11 is just the same as changing any other coupling cap, more/less detail, different sound.

Different caps are all about synergy with other caps and the rest of you system, you might find the sound too analytical with silver/silver mica, you might find it just right. Hard to say.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tube Phono Amps Primalsea Amplifiers 25 22nd November 2006 09:11 PM
Phono II mods : Dynamicap Silver Mica & tubes Rupert WAD General 6 25th October 2006 10:57 PM
Integrated valve amp with phono stage A.N. Beal Wish List 32 21st March 2006 09:44 PM
Valved Phono Stage v Solid state for MC cartridges Toppsy General 10 25th February 2006 09:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright World Designs