|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Gallery | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Amplifiers Your DIY amplifier designs |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
james - shunt reg q
was talking to nick the other day
and now i'm confused so with your bouncy shunt reg design do i need to shunt 120% of idle current or 120% of signal current and if the latter how do i calculate it dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
For SE the best sound is when you shunt 120% of the idle current... for PP its about 50% of idle current
ciao James |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
)^&(£)&_^_%6
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
Hey Dave,
Is it for a phono? Then somewhere between signal current double the signal current should be more than enough. As James said elsewhere, there's usually quite a bit of standing current in a phono by keeping gm high and noise down, no point shunting this - as its a fixed load. cheers, -- Andrew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
But you can start from about 50% of the idle current and work upwards as and when able. Just make sure you have some good capacitance before it to buffer the shunt when it runs out of current on peaks...
As with all music most of the time the amp is cruising at 20% of peak or less and thats where the shunt works best - of course it helps deliver clean peaks and cleans up after the peak really well if you have the current capacity in the shunt but it is still worth doing if you can get to 50% of idle current - or there abouts... Andrews point is accurate for some/most phono's but ones that run at 2 or 3 mA per stage should have full idle current shunt reg James |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
Hi Dave and James,
Of course my mind is on the the 1k5, you are, as usual, quite correct! cheers, -- Andrew |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: james - shunt reg q
Now I am getting more confused, why is a SE output stage stage best at 120% when there is a big inductor to reduce the variation in current, whereas in a phono SE stage, where there is no inductor and the PSRR is higher because of that, and you have huge gain, especially at low frequencies, less is ok?
I can see the point of 120% if you are actually regulating the DC voltage, but I thought the shunt was only operating at AC in this case, and at DC was just a constant current load, Confused of Halifax.
__________________
Just about everything I say has been in public use since the 1940's so no one owns the copyright on that. If by any chance its not prior art, then the copyright is retained by me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
andrew
no already done the phono just trying various choke:cap combos chaps for a few moments there was light now i find myself all damp + extinguished slapped by a wet herring or something..... that's 560mA current plus headroom for the tx dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: james - shunt reg q
The ac shunt does three things for an SE amp:
1) From the perspective of the output stage signal current loop it provides an active component for the return half of the loop and so replaces/minimises the sonic signature of the WE/ultrapath and psu caps. In theory this requires the shunt to swing the same signal current as the output stage so the shunt needs an idle current of maximum signal current plus enough "dc" current to keep the valve in its linear region when sourcing maximum signal current. this suggest the shunt needs the same idle current as the output valve for the same type of valve and maybe more if its different. 2) From the perspective of the psu the shunt plus output stage looks like a constant current load i.e. make it look like a resistive load ... so it removes all the signal based stresses from the psu and keeps its life easy - no current steps to get all bouncy over :-) 3) The shunt provides a broadband noise filtering action and so makes the amp quieter. Listening tests have shown that the amplifier sound improves with increasing shunt idle current up to about 120% of output stage shunt current or there abouts. I put this down to two effects a) the signal current swing is not just due to the output stage but due to all the amplifier stages b) more idle current through the shunt than the output stage makes the shunt more linear and you can hear that... For a phono stage with idle current of 10 to 1000 times the signal current swings then 1) and 2) are minimised so you can get away with much less current in the shunt reg. But I guess the acid test is to try it and see if more current in the shunt makes further improvement to the phono... Hope that helps James |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shunt mod pot | pre65 | General | 34 | 16th November 2006 05:00 PM |
Question on shunt regulation, JamesD's in particular | ChrisV | Amplifiers | 7 | 31st October 2006 02:39 PM |
James' Quasars | Max N | Loudspeakers | 47 | 13th August 2006 08:25 PM |
KEL84: Output Transformer Upgrade / Shunt Mod | pete_b | WAD General | 10 | 16th April 2006 07:55 PM |