World-Designs-Forum  

Go Back   World-Designs-Forum > WAD > WAD General
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Gallery Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

WAD General For discussions re World Audio Design

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd October 2008, 04:16 PM
Grog Grog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Wales
Posts: 108
Default Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

hi,
i'm looking for a good valve amp to try with my newly aquired klipschorns.
i've seen a KaT88 for sale at a reasonable price, but i've been reading up about a few problems people have had with this amp.
I don't need huge power (althought he klipsch are 16 ohm i think, so voltage needed)
would i be better off with a secondhand maplin 4-20 (with upgraded optx's)
or a secondhand kel84.
they are all in a similar price point secondhand.
to me the bass is very important, the klipsch have excellent dynamics and depth, i don't want to lose that.
i have no problems at all building my own amp, have scope sig-gen, b&k mic etc

but it seems to be cheaper to buy a secondhand kit. funds are tight, as i've just got the khorns and don't know if i'll like a valve amp.

my system is
downstairs
Khorns
Yamaha DSP-A1
Pioneer DVD575A

upstairs (although i can see this migrating downstairs soon !)
Acoustic precision eikos CD
technics SP10 BBC version. sme s3 arm
Michell Argo / Hera pre
Extensively modified Pioneer A400GTE power amp,
Veritas 40 transmission lines
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23rd October 2008, 05:20 PM
alnewall alnewall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chester
Posts: 764
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

Hi Grog, welcome to the forum.
Do you have another name?

I have a Maplin 4-20 somewhere and i suspect that its bass capabilities will not impress you greatly. Even with upgraded transformers, its likely that the kel84 is a nicer amp.

I also use a DVD575a, and have discovered that a separate DAC is well worth the trouble. Though the Pioneer dac is surprisingly good.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23rd October 2008, 05:44 PM
Grog Grog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Wales
Posts: 108
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

my 'real' name's George,
thanks for the advice.
i'm thinking the KAT88 may be the answer, but i hear the opt's are not up to much and the recomended sowter's are £500 ish.

maybe i'd be better saving up and getting a nice 2a3 or 300b kit, shame as i'd have to wait at least 9 months to afford either of these
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23rd October 2008, 05:49 PM
pre65's Avatar
pre65 pre65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ashen- Essex/Suffolk bord
Posts: 4,538
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

Hi George-it sometimes helps to indicate your location,there may be local (ish) members with amps who could demo with your speakers.
__________________
Philip.

Everything in this post is my honest opinion based on what i thought I knew at that very moment in time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd October 2008, 07:13 PM
Grog Grog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Wales
Posts: 108
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

Hi Philip, i'm in port talbot, south wales.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd October 2008, 11:56 PM
Greg.'s Avatar
Greg. Greg. is offline
WD Archivist
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 3,582
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

Hi George,

I used to have KaT88 which I heavily tweaked following Richard's (moderator here) work. I've now passed onto my son who has had it for several years and remains very happy with it. I never went for the Sowter upgrade as I thought that was a financial step too far. The standard Tx's are not bad and with some tweaking within the chassis the whole amp has a very presentable sound that includes that good deep fast bass typical of KT88's. In your position I would go with this option and not worry about the O/P Tx's at this stage. Upgrading these is very much 'expensive icing on the cake'. I'm sure Richard will chip in on this. His upgrade path and recommendations are still available from him or I can scan and send as it was all published on a previous WAD forum no longer accessable.

Best wishes,

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24th October 2008, 09:01 AM
Grog Grog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South Wales
Posts: 108
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

hi Greg,
if you could scan and send me what you have it would be appreciated.
as you say i think the KaT88 might be the best option, i'm just a bit worried about all the hum/stability problems that people seem to encounter.
__________________
George.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24th October 2008, 11:25 PM
Greg.'s Avatar
Greg. Greg. is offline
WD Archivist
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 3,582
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

Hi George,

OK, I'll do it if necessary, but all my records are hard copy so it'll take a while to do. I won't forget but lets see if Richard comes back on this first. he is very much the author of the tweaks on this amp and knowing him he'll have plenty digitally stored. I'll ping him with an email/PM. I see he's not visited for a couple of days so he may be away as he usually looks in daily.

Don't worry about the hum and stability issues. Stability was resolved after the initial release of the kit and must of us who had hum got it sorted with very good results.

Best wishes,

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26th October 2008, 10:09 AM
Richard Richard is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Notts
Posts: 5,357
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

Hi George,

There were indeed a few examples of instability in the first builds of Kit88. I had one of these and worked with Nick Lucas and the designer to resolve it (no choice, mine was humming with red plates!).

In the event, an increase in gridstopper values did the trick. The 6au6 stoppers were increased from 6k8 to 15k and the KT88 stoppers from 1k to 4k7 iirc. Presumably it had been designed and tested with easy load speakers/cables and more reactive loads upset it.

Later changes I made were to lower feedback by 5dB which gave a more open sound in my system. (It also increased the margin of stability by the same dB amount.)

Most folk also changed KT88 bias too (to prevent hot spots on the plates from excessive dissipation) either via the cathode resistors or the fixed bias divider. WAD later incorporated the increased gridstoppers and divider resistors as standard though the circuits I've seen don't show this.

The sound was excellent and the standard TXs were good even though they rang a bit on SW test. Some of us changed to Sowters and these could be run without gridstoppers. My notes include no gridstoppers, changed feedback and bias so probably wouldn't help a lot without the Sowters. Other changes were really just preferred choice of component "flavours".

So, looking back, perhaps it was a design that was a little rushed in bringing to market but it was certainly a very good amp once the niggles were sorted.

Rich
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26th October 2008, 03:03 PM
Ianm2 Ianm2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lancs
Posts: 1,175
Default Re: Kat88 is it any good?? with Klipschorns

I find it strange that noel said it was a gem of an ouput trnasformer, yet rich's findings indicated otherwise.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright World Designs